Establishing descriminative control during functional communication training

To address such situations, some researchers have examined the effects of programming delays to reinforcement in an effort to make FCT treatments more practical for implementation. She could follow two-step instructions, had a limited verbal vocabulary, and occasionally used a few signs. Agreement coefficients were calculated by dividing the smaller frequency by the larger frequency within each s bin, averaging all of the resulting quotients within a session, and converting the ratio to a percentage.

Several other investigations e. Next, one of the selected busy activities was paired with one of the selected nonbusy activities for each participant, such that two pairs of busy and nonbusy activities were created for each participant. The therapist taught both participants their targeted communication response using procedures similar to those described by Fisher et al.

In the current study, we extended previous research by teaching individuals to attend to naturally occurring discriminative stimuli e. A multiple baseline design was used with each participant, across pairs of busy and nonbusy therapist behaviors. A total of six sessions were conducted in this phase such that each therapist activity busy and nonbusy was presented only once.

These overt behaviors may have discriminative functions, especially when they are associated with differential reinforcement. Table 1 Open in a separate window The baseline condition was similar to the attention condition of the functional analysis i.

Thus, during each of these times, caregivers would be likely to engage in behaviors that could be characterized as either busy or nonbusy.

Busy and nonbusy activities were identified as activities that commonly occur in the natural environment and were categorized as busy or nonbusy based on whether or not the activity could be interrupted easily see Table 1 for lists of busy and nonbusy activities.

For each session, one busy and one nonbusy activity were selected randomly from the list. He was receiving treatment for aggression and disruption. Four test conditions and the control condition were evaluated for Angela, whereas two test conditions and the control were evaluated for Greg.

There appear to be several benefits of using a multiple-schedule arrangement to facilitate reinforcer delivery thinning following FCT.

As a measure of procedural integrity, observers recorded the amount of time in which therapists actually engaged in busy and nonbusy activities. The busy activities were talking to another person Pair 1 and cleaning Pair 2 for Angela and napping Pair 1 and writing Pair 2 for Greg. Thus, although effective, multiple schedules may present specific challenges for implementation.

Hanley, Iwata, and Thompson arranged a multiple schedule such that the functional reinforcer i. Angela was an 8-year-old girl who had been diagnosed with autistic disorder, stereotypic movement disorder with self-injurious behavior, and unspecified mental retardation.

Nonbusy activities were sitting while doing nothing Pair 1 and listening to music Pair 2 for Angela and sitting doing nothing Pair 1 and reading a magazine Pair 2 for Greg. Specifically, for half of each session the therapist engaged in an activity that was categorized as busy, and during the other half of each session, the therapist engaged in an activity that was categorized as nonbusy.Cooper Chapter 23 and 24 study guide by adhighley includes 27 questions covering vocabulary, terms and more.

Functional communication training (FCT) Establishes an appropriate communicative behavior to compete with problem behaviors evoked by an establishing operation. FCT develops alternative behaviors that are sensitive to EOs.

Example: A. Using Functional Communication Training to Replace Challenging Behavior Project funded by the Child Care and Head Start Bureaus in the U.S. Department of Health and During what activities is the child most success-ful? How does the child communicate what he needs or wants? Is the child able to use words to communicate, or is.

Functional communication training (FCT) is a systematic practice to replace inappropriate Establishing discriminative control of responding. using functional and alternative reinforcers during functional communication training. Journal of. Functional communication training (FCT) emerged from the literature on functional behavioral assessment (FBA) as a systematic practice to replace inappropriate behavior or subtle communicative acts with more appropriate and effective communicative behaviors or skills.

Reinforcement Schedule Thinning Following Functional Communication Training: Review and Recommendations Kuhn D.

DISCRIMINATED FUNCTIONAL COMMUNICATION: A PROCEDURAL EXTENSION OF FUNCTIONAL COMMUNICATION TRAINING

E, Thompson R. H. Establishing discriminative control of responding using functional and alternative reinforcers during functional communication training.

Krug A. Facilitating tolerance of delayed reinforcement during. These investigators examined resurgence during functional communication training (FCT), in which problem behavior was placed on extinction and alternative behavior of stimulus control decreased gradually over time.

Similarly, Doughty et al. (; Experiment 2) .

Download
Establishing descriminative control during functional communication training
Rated 0/5 based on 40 review